Abstract

High dynamic range (HDR) images require tone-mapping to be viewed on low dynamic range (LDR) displays. The performance of tone-mapping algorithms can be evaluated through a subjective study in which participants based on their liking rank or score tone-mapped images (TMIs). Subjective evaluation can be painstakingly slow; therefore, several quantitative metrics have been proposed for objective evaluation. This paper presents a new robust metric that uses 16 features, measuring the loss of color, contrast, brightness, and structure, extracted from the test TMI and the reference HDR image. The effect of these attributes on image quality is investigated and combined into a single score in the [0, 1] range describing the quality of TMI. We validate the performance of the proposed metric by comparing it with 24 existing state-of-the-art metrics. The study uses two subjective datasets of TMIs, including one existing benchmark dataset and a new proposed dataset comprising HDR images of a variety of scenes, and a dataset of traditional images not generated through tone-mapping. In these studies, our method shows the highest correlation with subjective scores for both datasets of TMIs and remains in the second position for the dataset of traditional images.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call