Quality assessment of the nominal attitude model of TOPEX/Poseidon using quaternion data

Abstract

The altimetry mission TOPEX/Poseidon was operational between 1992 and 2005 and provided innovative insight into global and regional sea level changes and their variability. The correct modelling of the spacecraft orbit in precise orbit determination requires detailed information on the attitude of the spacecraft body and the solar array. Since the availability of attitude observations in form of quaternion data for this mission is limited, the nominal orientation model has to be used mainly. In this study, we compare the nominal and quaternion-based approaches of the TOPEX/Poseidon attitude realisation and validate the nominal model w.r.t. the observed attitude. We found good agreement between both approaches in the spacecraft-related roll, pitch, yaw, and solar array angles with slight differences of up to 0.31° on average. The best accordance is obtained in the yaw angles. A general angular offset of 0.12° and -0.19° on average is found in the pitch and solar array angle differences, respectively. Parameters estimated in the orbit computation process also reflect the good agreement between both orientation models with slightly better results when using the observed attitude. However, in some intervals, the nominal model lacks detailed information about the correct attitude. These can be adjusted using the information from the quaternion data. Such intervals indicate off-nominal spacecraft attitude events like drifts or offsets. Purely geometrically analysed, mispointing in the roll and pitch components of about 0.25° results in a change of the altimeter phase centre position in the radial direction of about 7 mm, which directly impacts the sea-level heights determined from altimetry measurements.