Abstract

Neurofeedback training using real‐time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI‐NF) allows subjects voluntary control of localised and distributed brain activity. It has sparked increased interest as a promising non‐invasive treatment option in neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive disorders, although its efficacy and clinical significance are yet to be determined. In this work, we present the first extensive review of acquisition, processing and quality control methods available to improve the quality of the neurofeedback signal. Furthermore, we investigate the state of denoising and quality control practices in 128 recently published rtfMRI‐NF studies. We found: (a) that less than a third of the studies reported implementing standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps, (b) significant room for improvement with regards to methods reporting and (c) the need for methodological studies quantifying and comparing the contribution of denoising steps to the neurofeedback signal quality. Advances in rtfMRI‐NF research depend on reproducibility of methods and results. Notably, a systematic effort is needed to build up evidence that disentangles the various mechanisms influencing neurofeedback effects. To this end, we recommend that future rtfMRI‐NF studies: (a) report implementation of a set of standard real‐time fMRI denoising steps according to a proposed COBIDAS‐style checklist (https://osf.io/kjwhf/), (b) ensure the quality of the neurofeedback signal by calculating and reporting community‐informed quality metrics and applying offline control checks and (c) strive to adopt transparent principles in the form of methods and data sharing and support of open‐source rtfMRI‐NF software. Code and data for reproducibility, as well as an interactive environment to explore the study data, can be accessed at https://github.com/jsheunis/quality‐and‐denoising‐in‐rtfmri‐nf.

Highlights

  • Real-time fMRI: Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging involves the dynamic processing, analysis and visualisation of a subject's changing blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal and related information while the subject is inside the MRI scanner

  • Methods reproducibility and quality: Central to several aspects influencing the reproducibility of both methods and results in rtfMRINF is the concept of quality, which pertains to real-time fMRI data, to the neurofeedback signal and to methods reporting

  • Thibault et al (2018) suggested a list of best practices for Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI)-NF studies spanning the whole process from study design to outcome measurement, including suggestions for: (a) study pre-registration, (b) sample size justification, (c) inclusion of control neurofeedback measures, (d) inclusion of control groups, (e) collection and reporting of the BOLD neurofeedback signal, (f) collection and reporting of behavioural data and (g) outcome measure definitions and reporting. We propose both wider adoption of such best practices in rtfMRI-NF, as well as more granular specification of data quality measurement and reporting concerning the processing steps that could influence the quality of the signal being regulated

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Real-time fMRI: Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (rtfMRI) involves the dynamic processing, analysis and visualisation of a subject's changing blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal and related information while the subject is inside the MRI scanner. Take the assumption that the neurofeedback signal calculated from the realtime fMRI data aims to represent brain activity relating to the subject's ongoing cognitive processes (Koush, Zvyagintsev, Dyck, Mathiak, & Mathiak, 2012) It is well-known that the resting state or task-induced BOLD signal contains several scanner-, sequence-, subject- or experiment-related nuisance signals and artefacts (Caballero-Gaudes & Reynolds, 2017; Liu, 2016; Murphy, Birn, & Bandettini, 2013; Power et al, 2014). A systematic effort is needed to build up evidence that disentangles neurofeedback training outcomes from placebo effects, that clarifies the efficacy of neurofeedback compared to existing treatments, and that demonstrates the specificity of neurofeedback effects while accounting for other sources of variance To support this effort, this work reviews the methods currently available to the researcher to improve the data quality and signal-tonoise ratio (SNR) of the rtfMRI-NF signal and of real-time fMRI data and studies in general. We conclude with a general discussion and future recommendations based on the reviewed literature

| BACKGROUND
| Acquisition methods
| Processing methods
Drift removal and frequency filtering
Temporal filtering or averaging
Findings
| Methods reporting and best practice adoption
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call