Quality Analysis of Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma in the HD 16/17 Trials: A Final Report By the Reference Radiation Oncology Panel of the German Hodgkin Study Group

Abstract

The HD 16 and 17 trials by the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) have evaluated the use of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) in early-favorable and -unfavorable stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), respectively (1, 2). Quality of RT planning and execution is pivotal for treatment outcome in HL with protocol violations jeopardizing prognosis (3). Consequently, the present work aims at a decisive analysis of quality and dosimetry in the modern era. Random samples of 100 involved-field RT (IFRT) plans in HD16 and 176 plans in HD17 (134 involved-node RT (INRT) and 42 IFRT) were selected for analysis. Evaluation was performed systematically by the reference radiation oncology panel using pre-chemotherapy imaging, recommendation by the reference radiation oncology and RT planning imaging and graded as "correct", "minor" or "major deviation", respectively. RT doses to the target volume and organs at risks (OAR) were analyzed using dose-volume histograms. Median RT doses were 20 Gy (19.8 Gy-21.6 Gy) in HD16 and 30 Gy in HD17 (IFRT: 18-30.6 Gy, INRT: 14 Gy-40 Gy). Overall, 84.0%, 69.0%, and 76.1% of RT series in HD16, the IFRT-group of HD17 and the INRT-group of HD17, respectively, were planned correctly. The main reason for major deviation was an insufficient coverage of an involved region (11 %-14.3 %). There was no significant difference in quality between IFRT and INRT in HD17 (p = 0.418 for any deviations; p = 0.466 for major deviations). In comparison to previous GHSG studies in the respective stages, a significant increase in correct RT-series (p<0.001) and decrease in major deviations (p<0.001) occurred. However, doses to OAR varied individually with median values of 4.3 Gy (0.2 Gy-9.2 Gy), 4.7 Gy (0.2 Gy-15.2 Gy) and 3.8 Gy (0.0 Gy-16.0 Gy) for mean doses to the right lung, left lung and heart in HD16, respectively. Correspondingly, values were 9.8 Gy (0.3 Gy-20.0 Gy), 10.5 Gy (0.2 Gy-26.5 Gy) and 13.1 Gy (0.5 Gy-30.4 Gy) for mean doses to the right lung, left lung and heart in HD17, respectively. The size of the planning target volume decreased significantly with INRT compared to IFRT (median values: 1163.1 ml vs. 1464.3 ml; p = 0.043). However, only some OAR-parameters (V25 of the right and left lung, respectively, thyroid and spinal cord) showed significant differences between INRT and IFRT in HD17. The use of intensity-modulated techniques in HD 17 resulted in an increase in V5 and V10 of the lungs with a concomitant decrease in V20-V30. Quality of RT in the planning and treatment of HL has improved significantly with the latest GHSG study generation. Future analyses will focus on a further individualization of treatment fields.