Abstract

Prenatal care in traditional primary care units (UBS) and Family Health Strategy units (ESF) was evaluated by a cross-sectional study from July 2009 to February 2010 in Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil. Seven hundred and ninety-five postpartum women who had received prenatal care in either of the two types of units were interviewed. Four quality levels were used: level 1 (Kessner index modified by Takeda); level 2, which adds clinical obstetric procedures to level 1; level 3, which adds laboratory tests to level 1; and level 4, which includes all the above parameters. Prenatal care in the Family Health Strategy was superior to that of traditional primary care at all levels, with statistically significant differences in levels 1 and 2. Pregnant women received more guidance and prenatal care was superior in the Family Health Strategy. The study favored the Family Health Strategy, but improvement is still needed in the performance of procedures and laboratory tests in order to enhance prenatal care and strengthen primary care.

Highlights

  • Elenir Terezinha Rizzetti Anversa 1 Gisele Alsina Nader Bastos [1,2] Luciana Neves Nunes 3 Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol 1

  • Pregnant women received more guidance and prenatal care was superior in the Family Health Strategy

  • Outros motivos de exclusões foram: surto psicótico 1 (0%), isolamento devido à gripe por H1N1 2 (0%) e óbito materno por H1N1 1 (0%)

Read more

Summary

Valor de p

No presente estudo analisamos a qualidade do processo da assistência pré-natal no Município de Santa Maria, identificando diferenças na assistência pré-natal realizada nas UBS tradicionais e nas ESF, considerando número de consultas, início do pré-natal, procedimentos, exames realizados e orientações recebidas. Com base nos níveis de qualidade propostos, constatamos que a assistência prestada foi insatisfatória nos dois modelos de atenção, sendo que a qualidade da assistência pré-natal na ESF foi superior à das UBS tradicionais. A média de consultas de pré-natal realizadas pelas gestantes da ESF (6,8) é superior à encontrada em estudos anteriores (5,3 a 6,5) 2,9,22,24, mas inferior à verificada por outros autores (7,6 a 7,4) 3,7.

HbSAg Não Sim
Findings
Participação em grupos de gestantes Sim Não
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call