Abstract

Piedmont College’s quality enhancement plan (QEP) emphasizes a developmental and progressive integration of high-impact practices (HIPs) into the academic and social fabric of the institution. The QEP is HIP initiative provides students with multiple opportunities to deepen learning and leadership skills, which leads to improvements in student success, persistence, and retention. However, the institution grappled with how to effectively engage students in effective, meaningful research-based experiences. During the 2nd year of its QEP implementation, a campus-wide undergraduate research symposium was launched to showcase students’ research and creative inquiry in an effort to (a) gain full institutional participation in this crucial HIP and (b) offer the underserved student population (defined as ethnic minority, Pell-eligible, and first-generation students) an opportunity to participate in professional socialization and experience faculty mentorship. This case study shows the initial influences of this HIP on student success (in terms of grade point average [GPA]), students’ perceptions of their own learning, students’ persistence (measured with the Grit Scale), and retention from the 2018–2019 to the 2019–2020 academic year. Specifically, this study compared students who presented their research at the undergraduate research symposium to students who did not. While the immediate influence of this HIP on student persistence/perseverance (grit scores) remains undetermined, the retention rates and GPA appear to have been higher for students who presented, in both the dominant and underserved populations. Furthermore, students reported an increase in perceptions of their own learning. These findings are significant and affirm that undergraduate research communities can be considered a HIP for students, including those of underserved populations.

Highlights

  • IntroductionWhile departments throughout the college had already experienced some success with integrating undergraduate research experiences (UREs) at the course and programmatic levels, a collective undergraduate research community was needed to offer students the opportunity to display and discuss research outside the traditional classroom, receive interdisciplinary feedback, and develop an institutional culture of transformational research experiences, aimed at its underserved student population

  • This case study focuses on a small private college in northeast Georgia that is a member of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges

  • In response to this problem, during the 2nd year (2018–2019) of its quality enhancement plan (QEP) implementation, the college launched a campus-wide undergraduate research symposium to showcase students’ research and creative inquiry. This was in an effort to (a) gain full institutional participation in this crucial high-impact practices (HIPs) and (b) offer the underserved student population an opportunity to participate in professional socialization and experience faculty mentorship that provides “leadership to their own learning and the learning of others” (Camacho, Holmes, & Wirkus, 2015, p. 65)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While departments throughout the college had already experienced some success with integrating UREs at the course and programmatic levels, a collective undergraduate research community was needed to offer students the opportunity to display and discuss research outside the traditional classroom, receive interdisciplinary feedback, and develop an institutional culture of transformational research experiences, aimed at its underserved student population. In response to this problem, during the 2nd year (2018–2019) of its QEP implementation, the college launched a campus-wide undergraduate research symposium to showcase students’ research and creative inquiry. As part of the symposium implementation process, the QEP director, along with a specialized symposium steering committee, created a planning document that mapped out a timeline of development and execution

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call