Abstract
A black, shiny coating overlies rock paintings in Little Lost River Cave No. 1, located in southeastern Idaho. If this coating is the result of human activity within the cave – a condensate from cooking fires, for example – then a radiocarbon date on the coating would provide a minimum age for the underlying paintings. The work reported here was undertaken to test the assumption that the coating has an anthropogenic origin. Using pyrolysis-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (py-GC–MS) and thermally assisted hydrolysis-methylation-GC–MS, we have compared samples of the black coating from Idaho to humic acid, an experimental cooking residue, and amberat from packrats. The results show that the coating is not amberat, but bears the most similarity to humic acid, which would indicate a geologic origin for the coating. The age of the coating, then, is not likely related to the age of the paintings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.