Abstract
Silicone implants for the treatment of basal thumb arthritis were first proposed in the 1970’s by Swanson. They became extremely popular and despite good functional results, the high rate of complications such as instability, material breakage and foreign body reactions led to them being progressively abandoned by most surgeons. Pyrocarbon implants were introduced at the beginning of the 2000’s. A large range of different implant models that can be used for either hemiarthroplasty or interposition arthroplasty. For some implants, a supplemental ligamentoplasty procedure is required to avoid instability. Miniaturization of some implants provides new options for minimally invasive surgery, which is relevant in low and medium grades of osteoarthritis, especially for young, active patients. Medium- and long-term follow-up have now been reached by some pyrocarbon interpositions. Their results confirm that these implants are a reliable alternative to other techniques. This paper focuses on the surgical techniques and outcomes of pyrocarbon implants for the treatment of basal thumb arthritis. It is based on published data and the author’s experience.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
