Abstract
Introduction Emerging evidence suggests that tumour biology of rectal cancers differs from colonic cancer. This study aimed to determine which clinic-pathological factors affect lymph node yield (LNY) and survival in colonic (CC) compared to rectal cancer (RC). Methods Patients [a1] with stage I-III disease undergoing curative surgery, between 2006 and 2012, were included. Multivariate linear/logistic regression and Kaplan Meier survival analysis with SPSS version 21 were performed. Results 726 patients (M:F-398: 328, median age-70 years(63–78 yrs) were included (median follow up-58 months-(37–78 months)); 205 patients had RC. Male gender and younger age were associated with RC. A higher LNY was detected with RC compared to CC (median LNY:20 (14–27.5) versus 18 (12–25), p = 0.013). No differences in locoregional recurrence or distant metastases were found (CC 40/521 versus RC 13/205, p = 0.635 and CC 98/521 versus RC 36/205, p = 0.750 respectively). Overall survival (OS) was better in CC compared to RC (mean OS 114 months versus 90 months, p = 0.004); no difference in disease free survival (DFS) was observed. An inadequate LNY ( Conclusion An inadequate LNY is related to aspects of the primary tumour and is a marker of poor prognosis for CC patients only. No survival differences are observed for RC patients with an inadequate LNY compared to those with >12 lymph nodes questioning the prognostic significance of number of lymph nodes retrieval in RC. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.