Abstract
In February 2012, less than two weeks before that year’s presidential elections in Russia, a two-minute video of young women in brightly colored masks and short dresses was uploaded to YouTube. The video featured four members of the Pussy Riot punk feminist band performing a wild dance in front of the altar of Russia’s main Orthodox temple, the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow. Lip-syncing to a song, which they called a punk prayer, they beseeched the Virgin Mary to “drive” Vladimir Putin, then the prime minister and a presidential candidate, “away.” After generating scads of international publicity, the case ended with the three band members being sentenced to prison for two years on charges of hooliganism motivated by religious hatred. The clearly provocative nature of the performance – with costume changes mid-scene and anti-government, anti-Church protest slogans set to the music of a sacred Orthodox song – made the Pussy Riot case a springboard to discussion of the acceptability of religiously contextualized political speech in contemporary Russia. Through a critical discourse analysis of the original lyrics of the punk prayer and the report from the psychological and linguistic experts that formed the basis of the prosecutor’s case, this article explores the discursive devices and rhetorical strategies employed in these texts to challenge or sustain the existing power relations in Russia. As the analysis makes clear, while the punk prayer criticizes State and the Russian Orthodox Church as oppressive and corrupt by disrupting and denaturalizing the images typically associated with their rituals and spaces, the report normalizes conformity, depoliticizes Pussy Riot critique, and delegitimizes public political protests by pushing them beyond the boundaries of socially acceptable forms of citizens’ civic participation.
Highlights
In February 2012, at the height of that year’s presidential campaign in Russia, a short video was uploaded to YouTube by a member of the Pussy Riot punk feminist band (Matveeva)
The reason for their release, as the Russian authorities emphasized, was a nationwide amnesty to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Russian constitution, but it was interpreted by the band members as a PR stunt (“Freed Pussy Riot Activists”) before the Olympic Games that were hosted by Russia in February 2014
This article examines the discourse surrounding the acceptability of religiously contextualized political speech in contemporary Russia by conducting a critical discourse analysis of two texts related to the high-profile Pussy Riot blasphemy case: the original lyrics of the “punk prayer” performed in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior and the report from the psychological and linguistic experts that formed the basis of the prosecutor’s case
Summary
In February 2012, at the height of that year’s presidential campaign in Russia, a short video was uploaded to YouTube by a member of the Pussy Riot punk feminist band (Matveeva). In the independent Russian media and abroad, the performance was usually described—in line with the explanations provided by Pussy Riot in court—as having been targeted at the growing ties between church and state. Even these descriptions were quite understandably devoid of many specifics embedded in the cultural and historical context, which underrated the potential value of the performance for providing insight into the power relations in contemporary Russia that it meant to challenge. The prayer challenges the social norms sustained by the state and religious authorities, while the report intends to naturalize these norms and discredit religiously contextualized political protests as crossing the boundaries of legitimate public debate
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
