Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the jurisdiction to hear counterfeiting appeals if raised before administrative courts in Jordan, By comparing the position of the administrative judiciary in Jordan with that of the French and Egyptian administrative judiciary, Indicate whether the jurisdiction of the court in question is discretionary or restricted. The statement of the legal nature of this appeal and the position of jurisprudence and administrative judiciary on this nature.The results of the study showed that both the French and Egyptian administrative courts have admitted to themselves the power to consider the case of filing an appeal against forgery before the administrative courts, considering that the challenge of forgery is a sub-payment of the original judge. This was confirmed by the French State Council and the Egyptian State Council through the rulings of their administrative courts. One of the most important recommendations of the study was that the Jordanian administrative judiciary, especially after the issuance of the current administrative judiciary law, which came in response to the constitutional amendments scheduled in 2011, following the conduct of the French and Egyptian administrative judges, considering the impeachment of fraud by the original judge as a subsidiary payment to the original judge. Keywords: Forgery, administrative jurisdiction, legal nature. DOI : 10.7176/JLPG/93-10 Publication date: January 31 st 2020
Highlights
The allegation of forgery represents the sum of the procedures stipulated by the Evidence Law and the Evidence Law to prove the invalidity of official or customary papers, These procedures are intended to find out whether the paper presented in the case is correct or incorrect to reach the result represented by the judgment issued to accept or exclude the paper
The statement of the legal nature of this appeal and the position of jurisprudence and administrative judiciary on this nature.The results of the study showed that both the French and Egyptian administrative courts have admitted to themselves the power to consider the case of filing an appeal against forgery before the administrative courts, considering that the challenge of forgery is a sub-payment of the original judge
Study problem and questions The problem of the study about the validity of the administrative courts in Jordan is to see the application of the challenge of forgery if it is raised in a lawsuit filed before it as a sub-substantive payment related to the main lawsuit or not to recognize this authority itself on the basis of not being granted such authority by the Jordanian legislator, especially since the legal principles are the work of the administrative judiciary through the administrative judge, who must devise solutions and industry keys to resolving any dispute may be brought before it
Summary
The allegation of forgery represents the sum of the procedures stipulated by the Evidence Law and the Evidence Law to prove the invalidity of official or customary papers, These procedures are intended to find out whether the paper presented in the case is correct or incorrect to reach the result represented by the judgment issued to accept or exclude the paper. This study came to show the validity of the administrative courts in Jordan from the power to consider the appeal of fraud and investigation if raised before it or invalidity by referring this appeal to ordinary courts and the extent of change in its position after the constitutional amendments in 2011. Study problem and questions The problem of the study about the validity of the administrative courts in Jordan is to see the application of the challenge of forgery if it is raised in a lawsuit filed before it as a sub-substantive payment related to the main lawsuit or not to recognize this authority itself on the basis of not being granted such authority by the Jordanian legislator, especially since the legal principles are the work of the administrative judiciary through the administrative judge, who must devise solutions and industry keys to resolving any dispute may be brought before it
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
