Abstract

Increasingly, suburban universities find themselves in communities facing challenges that inner cities have had to deal with for decades, including concentrated poverty, housing vacancy, and underperforming school districts. While the problems are similar, the institutional context is different. Compared to central cities, suburban municipal governments generally lack the resources necessary to sustain robust community economic development initiatives. Further, suburbs often lack the rich landscape of nonprofit organizations that were built up over many decades in central cities. This article reflects on the experience of the University of Missouri-St. Louis as a case study of a suburban anchor institution. This experience suggests that anchor institutions in suburban settings need to focus on asset-based community development, support collective action among fragmented institutions, and build the civic capacity of local governments, nonprofits, and businesses.

Highlights

  • Urban issues are moving to the suburbs

  • We reflect on our experience as a suburban anchor institution to draw lessons for anchor institutions located in similar contexts

  • We argue that suburban anchors need to focus on asset-based community development, support collective action among often fragmented institutions and build the civic capacity of local governments, nonprofits, and businesses

Read more

Summary

Invited Commentary

Pursuing the Anchor Mission in a Fragmented Suburban Setting: Assets, Capacity, and Collective Action.

Introduction
The Suburban Context
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call