Abstract

Objective: To support the assessment and improvement of research data management (RDM) practices to increase its reliability, this paper describes the development of a capability maturity model (CMM) for RDM. Improved RDM is now a critical need, but low awareness of – or lack of – data management is still common among research projects.

Highlights

  • Research in science, social science, and the humanities is increasingly data-intensive, highly collaborative, and highly computational at a large scale

  • Improved research data management (RDM) was recognized as a critical area almost a decade ago (Gray 2009) with action needed across the data lifecycle

  • To support assessment and improvement of RDM practices that increase its reliability, we developed a capability maturity model for RDM (CMM for RDM)

Read more

Summary

Results

The RDM CMM includes five chapters describing five key process areas for research data management: 1) data management in general; 2) data acquisition, processing, and quality assurance; 3) data description and representation; 4) data dissemination; and 5) repository services and preservation. Key data management practices are organized into four groups according to the CMM’s generic processes: commitment to perform, ability to perform, tasks performed, and process assessment (combining the original measurement and verification). For each area of practice, the document provides a rubric to help projects or organizations assess their level of maturity in RDM

Conclusions
Introduction
Section 5: Repository services and preservation
Commitment to Perform
Ability to Perform
Activities Performed
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call