Purification of hydrogen from natural gas/hydrogen pipeline mixtures

Abstract

• A six-bed PSA cycle is proposed for the purification of hydrogen/natural gas mixture. • A three adsorbent layered bed is able to handle realistic natural gas mixtures. • High purity hydrogen (>99%) was obtained for hydrogen feed concentrations of 5–30%. • PSA compares well with an electrolyzer in providing hydrogen to a refueling station. There is an increasing global attention toward hydrogen as a green energy carrier, primarily because of the environmental concerns associated with global warming issues. It is expected that the produced hydrogen from various sources may be injected to the natural gas grid for economical transportation and use. One interesting option is to evaluate technologies for extracting the hydrogen from the natural gas pipeline for applications using high purity hydrogen. However, natural gas is a complex mixture including CH 4 , C 2 H 6 , CO 2 , N 2 and trace amounts of C 3 -C 6 hydrocarbons. This function requires a natural gas/hydrogen separation technology which must not only operate with low capital and energy cost, but must also provide hydrogen of sufficient purity. The goal of current work therefore was to take a mixture of hydrogen/natural gas of representative concentrations and produce high purity hydrogen using a bespoke pressure swing adsorption (PSA) cycle. A six-bed PSA system with 12 steps was developed and simulated in Aspen Adsorption software to this end. A three-layered adsorption column was designed to capture different groups of components of the mixture selectively within each layer. Informed by measured and literature equilibrium isotherm data, silica gel was chosen as the pre-layer to remove heavy hydrocarbon components and most of the CO 2 ; activated carbon in the main-layer to mainly adsorb methane, and LiLSX zeolite in the top-layer to remove trace nitrogen which had eluted from the earlier layers, for obtaining pure hydrogen product. High purity hydrogen product (>99%) with high recovery (>85%) was achieved with the PSA system for different hydrogen concentrations (5–30%) in the 30 bar feed stream. We also compared the PSA system against an electrolyzer generating hydrogen onsite. Our analysis suggests that the PSA competes favorably, even at a low hydrogen recovery of 40% in cases where the PSA plant is built at a pressure reduction station.