Abstract

A large body of literature documents the sensitivity of pupil response to cognitive load (1)and emotional arousal (2). Recent empirical evidence also showed that microsaccade characteristics and dynamics can be modulated by mental fatigue and cognitive load (3). Very little is known about the sensitivity of microsaccadic characteristics to emotional arousal. The present paper demonstrates in a controlled experiment pupillary and microsaccadic responses to information processing during multi-attribute decision making under affective priming. Twenty-one psychology students were randomly assigned into three affective priming conditions (neutral, aversive, and erotic). Participants were tasked to make several discriminative decisions based on acquired cues. In line with the expectations, results showed microsaccadic rate inhibition and pupillary dilation depending on cognitive effort (number of acquired cues) prior to decision. These effects were moderated by affective priming. Aversivepriming strengthened pupillary and microsaccadic response to information processing effort.In general, results suggest that pupillary response is more biased by affective priming than microsaccadic rate. The results are discussed in the light of neuropsychological mechanisms of pupillary and microsaccadic behavior generation.

Highlights

  • Introduction & BackgroundComplex cognition requires effort and taxes elementary cognitive processes such as working memory and attention

  • Following the literature on microsaccadic responses to cognitive effort (Di Stasi et al, 2013; Siegenthaler et al, 2014; Krejtz et al, 2018), we focused on microsaccade magnitude (MS Magnitude) and rate (MS Rate) as dependent variables

  • The present study investigated sensitivity of pupillary and microsaccadic measures to cognitive effort and arousal during complex decision making

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Complex cognition requires effort and taxes elementary cognitive processes such as working memory and attention. Decision making with multiple cues is a good example of such effortful mental process. Decision making is often performed under incidental emotional arousal elicited by external events. Eye tracking measures are well known as indicators of both mental effort and arousal (Kahneman & Beatty, 1966; Bradley, Miccoli, Escrig, & Lang, 2008). We investigate the sensitivity of microsaccadic and pupillary measures as indices of cognitive effort and emotional arousal during complex decision-making. Pupillary and microsaccadic responses to cognitive effort and emotional arousal during multi-attribute decision making.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call