Abstract

Reactive aggression, a hostile retaliatory response to perceived threat, has been attributed to failures in emotion regulation. Interventions for reactive aggression have largely focused on cognitive control training, which target top-down emotion regulation mechanisms to inhibit aggressive impulses. Recent theory suggests that mindfulness training (MT) improves emotion regulation via both top-down and bottom-up neural mechanisms and has thus been proposed as an alternative treatment for aggression. Using this framework, the current pilot study examined how MT impacts functional brain physiology in the regulation of reactive aggression. Participants were randomly assigned to 2 weeks of MT (n = 11) or structurally equivalent active coping training (CT) that emphasizes cognitive control (n = 12). Following training, participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during a retaliatory aggression task, a 16-trial game in which participants could respond to provocation by choosing whether or not to retaliate in the next round. Training groups did not differ in levels of aggression displayed. However, participants assigned to MT exhibited enhanced ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) recruitment during punishment events (i.e., the aversive consequence of losing) relative to those receiving active CT. Conversely, the active coping group demonstrated greater dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) activation when deciding how much to retaliate, in line with a bolstered top-down behavior monitoring function. The findings suggest that mindfulness and cognitive control training may regulate aggression via different neural circuits and at different temporal stages of the provocation-aggression cycle.Trial Registration: identification no. NCT03485807.

Highlights

  • Aggression, the intention to harm someone against their will, is a serious public health concern

  • As anticipated from prior research (Fanning et al, 2017), multilevel modeling (MLM) analyses showed there was a main effect of provocation level on behavioral aggression, such that high levels of provocation elicited higher retaliation on subsequent trials (MT M = 2.44, SD = 1.22; coping training (CT) M = 2.03, SD = 0.77) than did low levels of provocation (MT M = 1.89, SD = 1.14; CT M = 1.91, SD = 0.79), b = −0.267, SE = 0.070, p = 0.001

  • There was no main effect of training condition on behavioral aggression, such that across both high provocation and low provocation trials, mindfulness training (MT) and CT participants did not differ in noise levels chosen [b = 0.126, SE = 0.436, p = 0.777]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aggression, the intention to harm someone against their will, is a serious public health concern. Behavioral treatments have not been universally effective, so it is critical that researchers investigate alternative interventions for preventing or reducing aggressive behavior (Fix and Fix, 2013; Bertsch et al, 2020). Among evidence-based treatments, mindfulness-based interventions show potential for effectively reducing reactive aggression given that mindfulness practice has been linked to changes in neural function within executive control networks, associated with the inhibition of aggressive impulses (Bertsch et al, 2020), and emotion reactivity networks implicated in responsivity to emotional provocation (Hölzel et al, 2011; Tang et al, 2015). To date no studies have investigated the impact of mindfulness training (MT) on behavioral and neural indices of reactive aggression.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call