Pulsed-field ablation using a lattice-tip catheter without general anesthesia is feasible for atrial fibrillation ablation

Abstract

Abstract Background General anesthesia (GA) was employed to titrate lesion formations for a pulsed-field ablation (PFA) using a lattice-tip catheter. The evidence using a lattice-tip catheter without the use of GA is limited. Purpose We conducted a series of exploratory evaluation of a lattice-tip PFA catheter ablation without GA. Methods Patients undergoing their first atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures using a lattice-tip catheter were enrolled in the study. To assess acute outcomes and safety, the patients were divided into two groups: one undergoing the procedure with GA and the other without GA. Procedural characteristics were collected. Results In total, 20 patients (6 with GA, 14 without GA) were enrolled in the current study. One patient in non-GA group needed a larynx mask due to apnea from anesthesia. The pre-ablation 3D mapping time was equivalent between the two group (with GA versus without GA: 17±7 versus 16±5; P=0.762). All first-pass isolations of the pulmonary veins (PV) were successfully achieved, and there was no difference in the number of applications between the right and left PV (with GA versus without GA: 45±8 versus 53±12; P=0.206 and 47±14 versus 49±9; P=0.792). Linear lesions including anterior linear ablation (33% with GA and 36% without GA: P=1.000), roof linear ablation (67% with GA and 71% without GA: P=1.000) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation (0% with GA and 7% without GA: P=1.000) were performed. The ablation, laboratory stay and fluoroscopy times were equivalent between the two group (with GA versus without GA:88±22 versus 97±20; P=0.483, 128±25 versus 111±18; P=0.216 and 9±4 versus 10±2; P=0.902), while the pre-ablation preparation times were shorter in the group without GA (with GA versus without GA:40±17 versus 14±4; P<0.01). There was no major and minor procedural complication in both groups. Conclusions The use of a lattice-tip catheter for ablation without GA has a potential to shorten the whole procedural work-flow including preparing time while maintaining comparable safety and lesion formation to cases where GA is utilized.