Pulsed excimer laser versus continuous-wave Nd:YAG laser versus conventional angioplasty of peripheral arterial occlusions: prospective, controlled, randomised trial

Abstract

Early clinical studies of coronary and peripheral laser angioplasty showed that arterial occlusions could be recanalised by continuous-wave lasers delivered with contact probes and by pulsed lasers applied with multifibre catheters. However, whether laser-assisted angioplasty improves success rates in reopening occlusions and in long-term patency rates is unclear. We have compared the primary recanalisation and long-term patency rates after laser-assisted and conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of femoropopliteal artery occlusions in 116 consecutive symptomatic patients (excimer laser 37, Nd:YAG laser 40, PTA 39). Primary recanalisation was achieved in 81 patients (70%). The primary recanalisation rate achieved with the excimer laser was significantly lower than that with the Nd:YAG laser (49% vs 78%, p<0·01) or with PTA (82%, p<0·003). The overall angiographic recanalisation rate (primary and secondary recanalisation) after laser and PTA was 89%. After 3 months, clinical improvement was recorded in 76% of patients. Clinical long-term results were available in 94 (91%), and angiographic long-term results in 77 (75%), of 103 successfully recanalised patients. Life-table analysis of the long-term results revealed no significant difference of the restenosis rate between the three treatment groups. The 12-month patency rate was 60% as assessed clinically and 39% as judged by angiography. Primary and secondary recanalisation rates and long-term patency rates were significantly correlated with length of the occlusion. Our results suggest that PTA of femoropopliteal artery occlusions is only indicated if the occlusion is short (<8 cm) and that laser-assisted angioplasty should only be used after failure of conventional PTA.