Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy: comparison of efficacy between functional hypothalamic amenorrhea and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the ongoing pregnancy rate per initiated cycle between patients with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea and patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism treated with pulsatile GnRH administration. DesignRetrospective monocentric cohort study conducted at the University Hospital of Lille from 2004 to 2022. Patient(s)141 patients diagnosed with central supra-pituitary amenorrhea during infertility evaluation and subsequently treated with pulsatile GnRH therapy. 111 and 30 patients were diagnosed with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea or congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, respectively. Exposure(s)Pulsatile GnRH administration Main outcome measure(s)Ongoing pregnancy rate per initiated cycle. Result(s)Ongoing pregnancy rates per initiated cycle were comparable between groups: 21.5% in the functional hypothalamic amenorrhea group versus 22% in the congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism group; p=0.537. Comparison of baseline characteristics showed a more pronounced FSH deficiency in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism than in those with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea: 2.55 [0.6 - 4.92] versus 4.80 [3.90 - 5.70] UI/L; p<0.001. Within the congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism group, basal FSH level was positively associated with the occurrence of ongoing pregnancies (OR= 1.57; CI95%: 1.11;2.22; p=0.010). In the congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism group the duration of treatment was higher than in the functional hypothalamic amenorrhea group: 23.59 (±8.02) versus 18.16 (±7.66) days, p<0.001. ConclusionBaseline FSH is lower in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism than in patients with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea. The lower the FSH, the lower the chance of pregnancy in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. These patients also require more days of GnRH administration. However, the rate of ongoing pregnancies is comparable between the two groups.