Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundPulpotomy as a minimally invasive pulp therapy technique is the treatment of choice for carious pulp exposures, however many pediatric dentists perform pulpectomies in vital primary incisors. The aim of this split mouth randomized controlled study was to compare formocresol pulpotomy and zinc-oxide and eugenol pulpectomy in the treatment of vital pulp exposure in primary incisors.MethodsContralateral pairs of incisors were randomly assigned to receive pulpotomy or pulpectomy in children aging from 18 to 66 months old and were followed up for 12 months.Results39 pairs of incisors were included. Clinical and radiographical success rates showed no statistical significant difference (p = 1, p = 0.8 respectively). Relative risk measures for clinical success rates (RR = 1.03, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.23) and for radiographic success rates (RR = 1.03, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.29) with CIs including number one showing no difference between the two groups. The Survival rate using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis score showed 82% for pulpotomy and 74% for pulpectomy at 12 months (P = 0.2).ConclusionsBoth pulpotomy and pulpectomy techniques can be used successfully in the treatment of carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors.Trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered in Clinicaltrials .gov with this identifier NCT05589025 on 21/10/2022.