Abstract
International Journal of Paediatric DentistryVolume 16, Issue s1 p. 15-23 Pulp therapy for primary molars H. D. RODD, H. D. RODDSearch for more papers by this authorP. J. WATERHOUSE, P. J. WATERHOUSESearch for more papers by this authorA. B. FUKS, A. B. FUKSSearch for more papers by this authorS. A. FAYLE, S. A. FAYLESearch for more papers by this authorM. A. MOFFAT, M. A. MOFFATSearch for more papers by this author H. D. RODD, H. D. RODDSearch for more papers by this authorP. J. WATERHOUSE, P. J. WATERHOUSESearch for more papers by this authorA. B. FUKS, A. B. FUKSSearch for more papers by this authorS. A. FAYLE, S. A. FAYLESearch for more papers by this authorM. A. MOFFAT, M. A. MOFFATSearch for more papers by this author First published: 16 August 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00774.xCitations: 122 Professor Helen Rodd, Department of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, Sheffield, UK. E-mail: h.d.rodd@sheffield.ac.uk This revised Clinical Guideline in Paediatric Dentistry replaces the previously published eighth Guideline entitled ‘The pulp treatment of the primary dentition’ [Llewelyn, 2000]. The process of guideline production began in 1994, resulting in first publication in 1997. Each guideline has been circulated to all Consultants in Paediatric Dentistry in the UK, to the Council of the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry, and to people of related specialties recognised to have expertise in the subject. In the case of the present guideline, an internationally recognised expert on primary pulp therapy was invited to be a co-author (ABF). The final version of the guideline is produced from a combination of this input and thorough review of the published literature. The intention is to encourage improvement in clinical practice and to stimulate research and clinical audit in areas where scientific evidence is inadequate. Evidence underlying recommendations is scored according to the SIGN classification and guidelines should be read in this context. For those wishing further detail, the process of guideline production in the UK is described in the International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 1997; 7: 267–268. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume16, Issues1September 2006Pages 15-23 RelatedInformation
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
