Pulmonary venous systolic flow: Influence of gravity on pulmonary venous flow velocities assessed in patients with atrial fibrillation

Abstract

The origin of the pulmonary venous (PV) systolic flow wave is still unclear and could be the atrial relaxation and systolic descent of the atrioventricular plane, which decrease atrial pressure (suction) or raised PV pressure. In atrial fibrillation (AF), loss of atrial contraction and relaxation significantly modifies the systolic PV flow wave. The effect of recumbent positional changes on PV, however, has not yet been characterized in AF. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of positional changes on systolic PV flow in patients with AF studied by transesophageal echocardiography. The study group consisted of 45 patients with AF (34 patients with AF, alone, and 11 patients with mitral stenosis [MS]). To assess the influence of left atrial pressure, we included patients with MS and AF. Pulsed wave Doppler transesophageal echocardiography of the left and right upper PV were performed in the left lateral recumbent position in all patients and repeated records were obtained with the subject in the supine position in 25 (AF alone: n = 20, MS: n = 5) of 45 patients. In the left lateral recumbent position, the systolic PV flow velocity and systolic fraction of the left PV, which were recorded on the recumbent subject's lower side, were significantly increased compared with those of the right PV in both AF alone and MS with AF (33.9 ± 10.8 vs 13.8 ± 6.4 cm/s, 0.45 ± 0.09 vs 0.20 ± 0.10 in AF alone; 30.2 ± 11.7 vs 14.6 ± 6.0 cm/s, 0.43 ± 0.12 vs 0.20 ± 0.07 in MS, respectively, P < .01). By changing the position from the left lateral to the supine position, systolic PV flow velocity and systolic fraction of the left and right PV became the same (29.3 ± 8.4 vs 27.9 ± 8.4 cm/s, 0.39 ± 0.09 vs 0.36 ± 0.06 in AF alone, 23.5 ± 8.8 vs 27.5 ± 5.0 cm/s, 0.35 ± 0.08 vs 0.35 ± 0.09 in MS, respectively). These findings show that the PV volume (hydrostatic pressure) significantly modifies systolic PV flow wave in patients without atrial contraction and relaxation. We should take into consideration the body position on which PV flow is studied. (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:1087-93.)