Pulmonary vein isolation versus PVI + adjunctive strategy (substrate modification and renal denervation therapy) for the reduction of 12-month AF recurrence

Abstract

Abstract Background of the Study This meta-analysis assessed the latest evidence on the use of adjunct ablation strategies to standard pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Adjunct treatments were further classified as substrate modification (posterior wall isolation, linear ablation and ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms) or renal denervation (RDN). Purpose While ablation maintains sinus rhythm more effectively than antiarrhythmic drug therapy, recurrent AF remains common after 12 months, occurring in up to 40-60% of patients undergoing standard PVI ablation. Treatment strategies have diversified in a response to these challenges. These include reduction of the arrhythmogenic substrate, modulation of autonomic inputs and improvement of risk factors, such as hypertension. Methods A systematic literature search from MEDLINE and PubMed electronic databases was performed until November 2022. The primary outcome was 12-month AF recurrence defined as AF lasting ≥30 seconds on follow-up. The secondary outcome was incidence of procedure-related major adverse events (MAEs), defined as death, clinical strokes, acute heart failure decompensation, pericardial effusion causing tamponade, arteriovenous fistulas, and atrioesophageal fistulas. Results Nine studies comprising 1686 patients were included in the final analysis. AF recurrence was 487/1082 (45%) in the PVI + Adjunct group and 204/604 (33.8%) in PVI Alone. Pooled analysis showed that PVI + adjunct was inconclusively associated with less incidence of 12-month AF recurrence (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.60–1.04, I2 = 70%, p-value 0.09). Subgroup analyses of six RCTs under the PVI with substrate modification arm showed non-significant increase in 12-month AF recurrence in PVI + substrate modification (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.6-1.21, p-value 0.38). Subgroup analyses of the 3 RCTs on hypertensive AF patients showed strong evidence of decreased 12-month AF recurrence in PVI + RDN compared to PVI alone (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.89, p-value 0.007). Secondary outcome of major adverse procedure-related events in overall pooled analysis showed 8 events in 604 patients undergoing PVI alone, and 23 events in 1082 patients undergoing PVI + adjunct ablation. There is no significant difference in the number of reported MAE in PVI alone over PVI + adjunct (RR 1.16 [0.49-2.75], p = 0.73). Conclusion Overall, PVI with adjunctive strategies did not significantly reduce 12-month AF recurrence after ablation. Among these strategies, RDN demonstrated a significant reduction in the primary endpoint, whereas substrate modification did not. There was no significant difference in MAEs reported between standard therapy versus those with adjunctive treatment. We conclude that PVI ablation strategies should be individualized, and modification of both triggers and risk factors for AF show better rhythm control on follow-up.