Abstract
Aims A point-by-point workflow for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) targeting pre-defined Ablation Index values (a composite of contact force, time, and power) and minimizing interlesion distance may optimize the creation of contiguous ablation lesions whilst minimizing scar formation. We aimed to compare ablation scar formation in patients undergoing PVI using this workflow to patients undergoing a continuous catheter drag workflow.Methods and resultsPost-ablation cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging was performed in patients undergoing 1st-time PVI using a parameter-guided point-by-point workflow (n = 26). Total left atrial scar burden and the width and continuity of the pulmonary vein encirclement were determined on analysis of atrial late gadolinium enhancement sequences. Comparison was made with a cohort of patients (n = 20) undergoing PVI using continuous drag lesions. Mean post-ablation scar burden and scar width were significantly lower in the point-by-point group than in the control group (6.6 ± 6.8% vs. 9.6 ± 5.0%, P = 0.03 and 7.9 ± 3.6 mm vs. 10.7 ± 2.3 mm, P = 0.003). More complete bilateral pulmonary vein encirclements were seen in the point-by-point group (P = 0.038). All patients achieved acute PVI.ConclusionPulmonary vein isolation using a point-by-point workflow is feasible and results in a lower scar burden and scar width with more complete pulmonary vein encirclements than a conventional drag lesion approach.
Highlights
Despite ongoing technological advances in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), single procedure success rates remain modest
Post-ablation cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging was performed in patients undergoing 1st-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a and results parameter-guided point-by-point workflow (n = 26)
Total left atrial scar burden and the width and continuity of the pulmonary vein encirclement were determined on analysis of atrial late gadolinium enhancement sequences
Summary
Despite ongoing technological advances in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), single procedure success rates remain modest. Conducting gaps in the pulmonary vein encirclement are consistently identified as a cause of arrhythmia recurrence[1] and ablation lesion transmurality and contiguity are major determinants of electrically conducting gaps.[2,3] The Ablation Index Webster) is a real-time lesion assessment index incorporating contact force (CF), time, and power in a weighted formula. Ablation Index has been shown in canine studies to predict lesion depth[4] and in humans to identify sites of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.