Abstract

Single slice acquisition of conventional CT and volume scanning of spiral volumetric CT are compared in terms of detection and assessment of pulmonary nodules. Spiral CT is supposed to be superior to conventional CT in detecting all lung nodules by scanning the complete lung volume, while conventional CT may miss nodules due to inconsistent levels of inspiration for single slices. Different technical procedures of spiral CT may change the imaging of nodules and other findings. Fifty-two patients with known or suspected lung nodules were examined by conventional CT and spiral CT. Number and size of lung nodules and imaging of other pulmonary findings were registered independently by two radiologists. Spiral CT showed 15 lung nodules not seen on conventional CT, and missed one nodule. Spiral CT imaging of nodules was superior in some cases (characterisation of benign nodules) because complete scanning provided more information than conventional CT. It was worse in some cases (small nodules, fibrosis, small pleural effusion) due to the greater partial volume effect and less mAs. Technically improved spiral CT with longer scanning facilities and a 180-degree algorithm may be able to replace conventional CT for this indication.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call