Abstract
For at least 60 years, surgical resection has been a widely used approach to the management of patients with lung metastases from a variety of solid tumors. For many of these patients, surgical resection has provided the only potentially curative treatment. Analyses of numerous retrospective series have led to well-accepted surgical selection criteria: a primary tumor that has been definitively controlled, metastases limited to the lung that can be completely resected, ability of the patient to tolerate the planned operation, and lack of a better alternative treatment. The number of lung metastases, the disease-free interval since treatment of the primary tumor, the tumor doubling time, the presence of lymph node metastases, the histology of the primary tumor, and in some instances, elevated serum markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen are known to influence outcome and may be incorporated into the decision of whether to offer surgery to the patient. However, there remain many controversial aspects to
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.