Pulmonary Artery Banding and Arch Repair vs Norwood for Unbalanced Atrioventricular Canal Defect

Abstract

BackgroundThe outcomes of single-ventricle palliation in unbalanced atrioventricular canal defect with coarctation of aorta (uAVC+CoA) have not been well studied. Systemic ventricle outflow tract obstruction has a propensity to develop in these patients after aortic arch repair with pulmonary artery banding (arch-PAB), which may adversely affect survival and Fontan candidacy. MethodsA retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent single-ventricle palliation for uAVC+CoA from 2000 to 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on initial palliation: (1) arch-PAB and (2) Norwood procedure. Demographic and clinical characteristics were analyzed and compared along with survival data. ResultsStage 1 palliation for uAVC+CoA was performed in 41 patients. Arch-PAB was performed in 14 infants and Norwood in 27 infants. Arch-PAB patients had more chromosomal abnormalities (28.6 vs 7.4%, P < .009) and less severe systemic ventricle outflow tract obstruction on baseline echocardiogram (0.0 vs 70.4%, P < .001). Survival to stage 3 palliation was lower for the arch-PAB group (28.6% vs 66.6%, P = .02). Arch-PAB remained a significant risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.05-8.53; P = .04) after adjusting for chromosomal abnormalities and atrioventricular valve regurgitation. After arch-PAB, systemic ventricle outflow tract obstruction was diagnosed in 13 of 14 patients. Echocardiography underestimated the degree of outflow tract obstruction in 10 of 13 arch-PAB patients. ConclusionsArch-PAB has worse outcomes than Norwood for uAVC+CoA. Systemic ventricle outflow tract obstruction develops in almost all patients after arch-PAB. Outflow tract obstruction is underestimated by the echocardiogram and requires a high index of suspicion, along with advanced imaging, to ensure timely diagnosis and management.