PULM14: Long-haul ECMO as Bridge to Transplant in COVID-19 ARDS

Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to lung transplantation (LT) is an established treatment modality for refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Per the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database, 215 patients supported on ECMO due to the Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) related ARDS underwent LT between August 2020 and June 2022. The COVID-19 pandemic limited donor availability and increased duration of ECMO support in ECMO-dependent patients listed for LT. Outcomes of long-term ECMO as bridge to transplant (BTT) in this population remain unclear, and no cases of VV ECMO greater than 200 days has been documented in the literature. Methods: A single-center review was conducted to identify patients cannulated for VV-ECMO to treat COVID-19 associated ARDS between January 1, 2021 and January 1, 2022. Patients were selected who were supported by VV-ECMO for ARDS secondary to COVID-19 for greater than 200 days before receiving a lung transplant. Detailed analysis was performed for the outcomes and characteristics of all patients who received a lung transplant for post-COVID-19 ARDS after >200 days of VV-ECMO support. Results: Three patients were identified as long-term ECMO as BTT recipients (>200 days) for COVID-19-associated ARDS. Average age was 38 years (22,52), BMI 32.9 (31.6,34) and no patients had any known relevant respiratory medical history. One patient had a history of daily e-cigarette use. All patients were unvaccinated at the time of first positive COVID-19 test. All were successfully bridged to bilateral lung transplant (BLT) off of VV-ECMO. None required VV-ECMO post-operatively. One patient required VA-ECMO post-operatively for elevated pulmonary arterial pressures related to incidentally discovered septal defects. Average ECMO duration was 278 days (250, 324). Two patients were cannulated as bridge to recovery, and one as bridge to decision. Patients remained ambulant on ECMO support until they were able to undergo the transplant procedure. Cannulation strategies included double lumen right internal jugular (RIJ), RIJ to right femoral vein, and bifemoral venous cannulation. Complications on ECMO included sepsis, hemorrhage, stroke, reconfiguration, and atrial fibrillation. Two were discharged to home and one to inpatient rehabilitation. Average length of stay after transplant was 27 days (16,37). All 3 patients have continued to do well. Conclusion: We present three patients with the longest documented VV-ECMO support for COVID-19 ARDS a bridge to lung transplant. Our findings suggest long-term VV-ECMO support is a feasible bridge to LT for patients with COVID-19-related ARDS when used in the long-term (>200 days). The duration of ECMO support remains associated with known ECMO-related complications. Post-transplant survival to-date suggests that survival in long-term ECMO support as a BTT may be comparable to short-term ECMO in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS.