Abstract
Abstract This article empirically evaluates the publication habits of United States Court of Appeals judges before and after the 1987 Bork hearings by examining publishing trends during the years 1983–92 and then by performing a multiple regression analysis on the collected data. The analysis shows that publishing by court of appeals judges declined significantly following the Bork hearings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
