Abstract

The original version of this Article contained an error in the third sentence of the first paragraph of the ‘Spin polarizing the Sr+ ion with ultracold atoms’ section of the Results, which incorrectly read ‘The Langevin collision rate is 1.’ The correct version adds ‘kHz’ after ‘1.’ The fifth sentence of this same paragraph originally read as “Although 87Rb has a I = 3/2 nuclear spin and a hyperfine-split ground-state manifold, 88Sr has no nuclear spin and a Zeeman split two-fold ground state”, which is incorrect. The correct version states “88Sr+” instead of “88Sr”. The first sentence of the fourth paragraph of this same section originally read as “As the collisional energies are on the mK energy scale, spin exchange between Sr+ and Rb prepared in the F = 1 state is allowed only as long as it does not require Rb to change its hyperfine state and climb the 330 m hyperfine energy gap”, which is incorrect. The correct version states “330 mK” instead of “330 m”.In the Discussion section, the text was originally incorrectly repeated.This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Highlights

  • The original version of this Article contained an error in the third sentence of the first paragraph of the section “Spin polarizing the Sr+ ion with ultracold atoms” in Results, which incorrectly read as “The Langevin collision rate is 1”

  • The first sentence of the fourth paragraph of this same section originally read as “As the collisional energies are on the mK energy scale, spin exchange between Sr+ and Rb prepared in the F = 1 state is allowed only as long as it does not require Rb to change its hyperfine state and climb the 330 m hyperfine energy gap”, which is incorrect

  • Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.S

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The original version of this Article contained an error in the third sentence of the first paragraph of the section “Spin polarizing the Sr+ ion with ultracold atoms” in Results, which incorrectly read as “The Langevin collision rate is 1”. Tomas Sikorsky1, Ziv Meir1, Ruti Ben-shlomi1, Nitzan Akerman1 & Roee Ozeri1 The correct version adds “kHz” after “1”.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.