Abstract

 
 
 A systematic review about publications on the Family Health Support Centers (FHSC) and the participation of the Physical Education Professional (PEP) was conducted. Recorded in PROS- PERO, following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) in Pubmed, Lilacs, Scopus, Bireme and SciELO, with the following keywords: Family Health Support Center; FHSC; Primary Health Care; Health Promotion; In- tervention Studies; Physical Education; Physical Activity. Sixty studies about NASF were found, most of them about the implementation of the program and about actions undertaken by the teams. Of the total, seven studies in the area of Physical Education. In conclusion, studies about FHSC are qualitative methods and do not address the e ectiveness of the developed actions, only describe them. As well as with publications about PEP.
 
 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
