Publication pressure in medical imaging

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the degree of perceived publication pressure in medical imaging. MethodCorresponding authors who published an article in one of the top 12 general radiology journals were invited to complete a survey about publication pressure. The revised Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQr) was used. Higher PPQr scores (5-point Likert scale) indicate a more negative view towards the various domains of publication pressure. Results203 corresponding authors participated. Median PPQr scores in the domains “publication stress”, “publication attitude”, and “publication resources” were 3.33, 3.50, and 3.67, respectively. Age 25–34 years (β coefficient 0.366, P = 0.047), female gender (β coefficient 0.293, P = 0.020), and 5–10 years of research experience (β coefficient 0.370, P = 0.033) were associated with a higher level of perceived publication stress, whereas age ≥ 65 years was negatively associated with perceived publication stress (β coefficient −0.846, P < 0.001). Age 55–64 years and age > 65 years were associated with a more positive view towards the publication climate (β coefficients −0.391 and −0.663, P = 0.018 and P = 0.002, respectively). Age 45–54 years was associated with a perception of fewer factors available to alleviate publication pressure (β coefficient 0.301, P = 0.014), whereas age 25–34 years was associated with a perception of more factors available to alleviate publication pressure (β coefficient −0.352, P = 0.012). ConclusionPerceived publication pressure among medical imaging researchers appears to be appreciable and is associated with several (academic) demographics.