Abstract
BackgroundSystematic reviews and meta-analyses of pre-clinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical care. Publication bias is one of the major threats of validity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Previous empirical studies suggested that systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become more prevalent until 2010 and found evidence for compromised methodological rigor with a trend towards improvement. We aim to comprehensively summarize and update the evidence base on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal studies, their methodological quality and assessment of publication bias in particular.Methods/DesignThe objectives of this systematic review are as follows:•To investigate the epidemiology of published systematic reviews of animal studies until present.•To examine methodological features of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal studies with special attention to the assessment of publication bias.•To investigate the influence of systematic reviews of animal studies on clinical research by examining citations of the systematic reviews by clinical studies.Eligible studies for this systematic review constitute systematic reviews and meta-analyses that summarize in vivo animal experiments with the purpose of reviewing animal evidence to inform human health. We will exclude genome-wide association studies and animal experiments with the main purpose to learn more about fundamental biology, physical functioning or behavior.In addition to the inclusion of systematic reviews and meta-analyses identified by other empirical studies, we will systematically search Ovid Medline, Embase, ToxNet, and ScienceDirect from 2009 to January 2013 for further eligible studies without language restrictions.Two reviewers working independently will assess titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility and extract relevant data from included studies. Data reporting will involve a descriptive summary of meta-analyses and systematic reviews.DiscussionResults are expected to be publicly available later in 2013 and may form the basis for recommendations to improve the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal studies and their use with respect to clinical care.
Highlights
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pre-clinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical care
systematic review (SR) of animal studies can influence clinical care directly or indirectly through guidelines and clinical studies that are designed based on evidence from pre-clinical studies
In order to better understand the extent of that influence we plan to examine citations of identified reviews in publications of clinical studies
Summary
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pre-clinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical care. We aim to comprehensively summarize and update the evidence base on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal studies, their methodological quality and assessment of publication bias in particular. Many pre-clinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, may influence clinical care of patients through the following mechanisms: i) information for the design of clinical studies, ii) clinical guidelines considering pre-clinical evidence when clinical evidence is lacking, or iii) direct guidance of clinical practice. A recent empirical study showed that a substantial number of overviews of animal experiments investigating therapies for sepsis explicitly extrapolated results from animal studies to human patients and that subsequent citations of these overviews in publications of clinical studies reflect the influence of preclinical on clinical research [2]. In an update study Korevaar et al reported that SRs of pre-clinical studies are getting more common over time, doubling their number roughly every 3 years between 1997 and 2010 [6]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
