Abstract
One of the most urgent and controversial problems in the field of ensuring state and municipal needs is the public procurement artificial fragmentation. Fragmentation is carried out by customers in order to bypass certain price thresholds established by legislation in the field of procurement, to simplify or speed up procedures, or to obtain material benefits. At the same time, the discussion of the issue of procurement fragmentation is created by the lack of consolidation of this concept in legislation, which in turn leads to the emergence of different opinions regarding the criteria for qualifying a particular activity as fragmentation. The ambiguity in this matter is reinforced by the presence of generally ambiguous administrative and judicial practice. That is why the issue of procurement fragmentation remains relevant both for state and municipal customers and for regulatory authorities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Buhuchet v zdravoohranenii (Accounting in Healthcare)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
