Abstract

This paper makes an analysis of the European System of Accounts (ESA95) financial treatment of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP). PPP are complex operations that allow incumbents to create infrastructures while hiding debt, with an eye on the next elections. However, the sad part of the story is that PPP are more expensive than traditional contracts in the long run. We think that PPP are not always the best solution. Governments should allocate the risk to the party that is the “least cost avoider”, i.e., the party best suited to control and/or bear the risk. Without this approach, the public sector runs the risk of using PPP with the aim to achieve inadequate goals, for example to achieve a short-term improvement of public accounts, and at the same time, worsening the long-term financial picture.

Highlights

  • The public sector aims to provide the best services and the most complete infrastructures to the citizenry

  • This paper makes an analysis of the European System of Accounts (ESA95) financial treatment of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP)

  • The public sector runs the risk of using PPP with the aim to achieve inadequate goals, for example to achieve a short-term improvement of public accounts, and at the same time, worsening the long-term financial picture

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The public sector aims to provide the best services and the most complete infrastructures to the citizenry. With the aim of publishing a methodological regulation that ensures the coherence, the Eurostat issued a regulation on PPP: News Release No 18/2004 of February 11th, Treatment of Public-Private Partnerships, which was later included and developed in Section 4 of the “ESA95 Manual on government deficit and debt”. This standard is the ESA95 technical standard currently used in the EU to account for PPP operations.

Theoretical Framework
Public Works’ Funding through Public-Private Partnership
Concessions
Leases
Who determines the nature of the asset?
Who bears the demand risk?
Are there any third part revenues?
Who bears the residual value risk?
Findings
Concluding Remarks

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.