Abstract

We debate the motivation for and effectiveness of public policies to encourage individuals to become entrepreneurs. Reviewing established evidence we find that most western world policies do not greatly reduce or solve any market failures but instead waste taxpayers’ money, encourage those already intent on becoming entrepreneurs, and mostly generate one-employee businesses with low growth intentions and a lack of interest in innovating. Most policy initiatives that would have the effect of promoting valuable entrepreneurship would not be recognizable as such, because they would primarily address other market failures: a central-payer healthcare would remove health-care related distortions affecting employment choices; greater STEM education would produce more engineers of which some start valuable new firms; and labor market reform to encourage hiring immigrants in jobs they have been educated for would reduce inefficient allocation of talent to entrepreneurship.

Highlights

  • Entrepreneurs are widely celebrated as job creators and catalysts for economic growth

  • We argued that there were three prerequisites to any policy intervention: willing and able entrepreneurial talent stranded in wage employment; an economy made worse off as a result; and the ability of policy aimed at stimulating entrepreneurship to fix the problem

  • This paper is a debate about whether there is a strong motivation for public policies to stimulate more people to enter entrepreneurship and self-employment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Entrepreneurs are widely celebrated as job creators and catalysts for economic growth. The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical discussion of the motivation for and effectiveness of public policies to encourage individuals to become entrepreneurs. Working from a common perspective regarding the pros and cons of entrepreneurial public policy, and the aim of this paper is to capture that debate. To that end, it follows an unorthodox structure, with each section devoted to the arguments each author provided in the debate. We as a society are worse off because of this; More policies like the ones we have would correct this social problem Table below (from Astebro forthcoming) provides a few examples which focus on general policies of the kind which the four authors find agreement on are especially difficult to provide social welfare

Background
The entrepreneur
Externalities and market failures motivating policy
Who becomes an entrepreneur and why?
Most people would be better off not becoming entrepreneurs
People choose to become entrepreneurs predominantly because they like it
Overwhelmingly entrepreneurs do not create any value beyond private benefits
Source
Well-intended public policies often go wrong
Labor markets
Capital markets
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.