Abstract

This is a cross-sectional study focusing on public policy in the seven nations of Central America: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama. Outcomes are evaluated in terms of public wellbeing. Public policy is operationalized: with regard to business using two measures, one for economic freedom and another for corporate taxation; with regard to ethics using two measures, one for gender equality and another for corruption; with regard to openness using four measures, two external, trade and tourism, and two internal, the number of roads in a country and the number whites in a country; and with regard to contraception using a single measure, fertility. Public wellbeing is operationalized using: three economic measures, GDP per capita, lost income, and poverty rate; four societal measures, literacy rate, homicide rate, life expectancy, and lost satisfaction; and, two holistic measures, the Human Development Index and the Environmental Performance Index. Pearson correlation is used to calculate the linear association for each pair of measures. The results suggest that there is no relationship between public wellbeing and two measures of public policy: gender equality and the number of roads in a country. But there is evidently a relationship between public wellbeing and the remaining seven measures of public policy: economic freedom, corporate taxation, corruption, trade, tourism, the number of whites in a country, and fertility. And the direction of those seven relationships supports the claims of capitalists as opposed to the claims of socialists.

Highlights

  • This is a cross-sectional study focusing on public policy in the seven nations of Central America: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama

  • The results suggest that there is no relationship between public wellbeing and two measures of public policy: gender equality and the number of roads in a country

  • The percentages of whites in the populations of El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama are reported in a field listing of ethnic groups in the World Factbook published by the Central Intelligence Agency (2012a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This is a cross-sectional study focusing on public policy in the seven nations of Central America: Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama. The initial level of analysis for this study is national rather than regional because sovereign states are “crucial actors in both the internal and international scene” Most data are measured and collected at the national as opposed to the regional level. Each bivariate hypothesis corresponds to propositions drawn from the politicized literature of the region. Each empirical test is two-tailed with outcomes in one tail validating capitalist or neo-liberal policy and with outcomes in the other tail validating socialist policy whether neo-fascist or neo-communist like the “indigenous villages (of Central America) ... The presence of association leads one to reject the null hypothesis whereas the absence of association leads one to fail to reject it

Hypothesis 1
Hypothesis 2
Hypothesis 3
Hypothesis 4
Hypothesis 5
Hypothesis 6
Hypothesis 7
Hypothesis 8
Hypothesis 9
Corporate Taxation
Corruption
Tourism
Number of Roads
Number of Whites
Fertility
GDP per Capita
Lost Income
Poverty Rate
Literacy Rate
Life Expectancy
Lost Satisfaction
Methods and Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call