Public opinion on crime causation: An exploratory study of Philadelphia area residents

Abstract

PurposeThis study examined the views on crime causation from a sample of randomly selected Philadelphia area residents. MethodsThrough the use of a phone survey, residents (N=359) were asked thirty seven questions related to their level of support for several criminological theories, including classical theory, biological theory, psychological theory, social disorganization theory, strain/general strain theory, subcultural theory, social learning theory, social control/general theory, labeling theory, critical theory, and environmental criminology theory. The analyses assessed whether the views of respondents differed by race, gender, and political ideology. Both across-race and within-race analyses were also conducted to determine the nuances of the support for specific criminological perspectives. ResultsThe results pointed to numerous significant gender differences and across-race differences in public opinion on crime causation but few within-race differences. The results also confirmed previous research that supported the notion that one's political ideology is tied to the level of support for certain criminological theories. ConclusionOverall, the results point to the merits of including the views of lay persons when there are discussions pertaining to crime causation.