Abstract

The Colombian Government has made significant progress in the implementation of effective processes, practices, and methodologies for public investment management (PIM). A 2011 IMF-published report ranked Colombia among the top 5 countries with best PIM practices out of a sample of 71 low- and middle-income countries (Dabla-Norris and others, 2011). The report assessed the following 4 key features: (a) strategic guidance and project review, (b) project selection and budgeting, (c) project implementation, and (d) project evaluation and auditing. Colombia was deemed to have achieved a good performance on 3 out of the 4 key features. Nevertheless, the country’s PIM system still faces the need for areas of improvement identified by the World Bank’s PIM framework. This framework allows for identification of not only the presence of must-have features in PIM systems that are key to promoting effective and efficient public investment but also if those features are implemented in the field and if they have achieved their intended purpose. In the case of Colombia, the main challenges identified were related to the broad implementation of tools designed, particularly for management of public investment projects as well as with the fractioning of standards and practices, and the overemphasis placed on formal controls during the formulation and project implementation stages. In addition, the country PIM processes had weaknesses in terms of the review and ex post project evaluation. This document summarizes the main findings of a PIM study carried out in Colombia in 2015. The document includes an analytical framework for assessing public investment management and presents the assessment results as well as improvement recommendations to strengthen the institutional set-up to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of public investment in Colombia.

Highlights

  • The country’s public investment management (PIM) system still faces the need for areas of improvement identified by the World Bank’s PIM framework.2. This framework allows for identification of the presence of must-have features in PIM systems that are key to promoting effective and efficient public investment and if those features are implemented in the field and if they have achieved their intended purpose

  • In the case of Colombia, the main challenges identified were related to the broad implementation of tools designed — for management of public investment projects as well as with the fractioning of standards and practices — and the overemphasis placed on formal controls during the formulation and project implementation stages

  • The use of general guidelines allows for anchoring government decisions and guides sector decision-makers to align themselves with national priorities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1. The Colombian Government has made significant progress in the implementation of effective processes, practices, and methodologies for public investment management (PIM). The report assessed the following 4 key features: (a) strategic guidance and project review, (b) project selection and budgeting, (c) project implementation, and (d) project evaluation and auditing. 2. the country’s PIM system still faces the need for areas of improvement identified by the World Bank’s PIM framework.. The country’s PIM system still faces the need for areas of improvement identified by the World Bank’s PIM framework.2 This framework allows for identification of the presence of must-have features in PIM systems that are key to promoting effective and efficient public investment and if those features are implemented in the field and if they have achieved their intended purpose.

Framework for Public Investment Management
Evaluation
Peculiarities of Public Investment in Colombia
Institutional Arrangements for Public Investment Management
The Diagnostic
Fractioning by source of funding
Confusion between management, fiduciary, and auditing controls
Limited differentiation between project types and implementing agencies
Formalistic controls
Weak ex post review and evaluation
Fragmentation of technical assistance
Integral management and control throughout the public investment cycle
Clearly separate the management control from the fiduciary and auditing functions
Differentiate project types and implementing agencies
Emphasizing results
Strengthen ex post review and evaluation functions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.