Abstract
Method Working with three Cochrane Review Groups (CRG); Airways, Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) and Pregnancy and Childbirth we focussed on outcomes for reviews in Asthma, Rhinosinusitis and Breastfeeding respectively. For each group we used a different method to engage; for asthma we facilitated a full day workshop. Working in partnership with Asthma UK, we prepared for this by gathering perspectives of asthma via a Facebook survey, and reviewing existing core outcome sets. Working in partnership with evidENT we gathered perspectives in rhinosinusitis using an online survey and experimented with social media as a way of reaching out beyond their networks as there are no relevant patient groups. We compared survey findings with existing outcomes used for reviews of chronic sinusitis. For breastfeeding we worked with the National Childbirth Trust and the Breastfeeding Network to review an existing online collection of experiences of breastfeeding called Healthtalk (http://www. healthtalk.org). Healthtalk researchers reanalysed the original data for clues to outcomes. These were shared, discussed and compared with existing outcomes used in systematic reviews of breastfeeding interventions.
Highlights
From The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative Calgary, Canada. 20-21 May 2015. This presentation will focus on a UK Cochrane funded project that explored different ways of engaging patients, the public and health practitioners in the development of outcomes for systematic reviews
Working with three Cochrane Review Groups (CRG); Airways, Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) and Pregnancy and Childbirth we focussed on outcomes for reviews in Asthma, Rhinosinusitis and Breastfeeding respectively
For breastfeeding we worked with the National Childbirth Trust and the Breastfeeding Network to review an existing online collection of experiences of breastfeeding called Healthtalk
Summary
This presentation will focus on a UK Cochrane funded project that explored different ways of engaging patients, the public and health practitioners in the development of outcomes for systematic reviews. Public engagement in outcomes development three degrees of separation From The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative Calgary, Canada. Background This presentation will focus on a UK Cochrane funded project that explored different ways of engaging patients, the public and health practitioners in the development of outcomes for systematic reviews. It is called ‘Outcomes Most Important for Patients, Public and Practitioners (OMIPPP)’.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
