Abstract
ABSTRACTThere are few formal or clear rules governing when and why judges may make public statements outside their official duties. The conventions which govern public statements by judges are general in nature and proceed upon the assumption that judges can and should avoid controversial issues when they speak publicly. That assumption does not anticipate instances where the issue in question is about a fellow judge, or the very court on which a judge sits. What can or should judges say when one of their colleagues or their own court is what they wish to speak about? Can judges avoid controversy in such cases? What should they do? This article examines those issues by reference to the public statements made by many judicial officers during the controversy about the appointment and tenure of the former Chief Justice of Queensland, the Hon Timothy Carmody.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
