Abstract
Compelling a party to disseminate judicial orders through her Homepage implies a relevant discretionary power. The work discusses the extension of such a judicial power, pointing out some questions and raising some concerns.What is the real function of such prominent advertising? Is it possible to repair a damage beared by a private plaintiff by re-establishing a correct information of the public at large? Can injunctive reliefs transcend the immediate interests of the litigants in order to further social objectives? This paper does not provide definitive answers, rather it is a starting point for a discussion.The survey recalls other questions like: the increasing use of moral arguments in Courts’ reasoning in order to prevent violations or breach of duties, public information and commercial certainty as legal goals, the controversial shaming effect of the remedy at issue and the threats to personality rights and freedom of expression.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
