Abstract

The mobile internet has resulted in intimate partner violence (IPV) events not being viewed as interpersonal and private issues. Such events become public events in the social network environment. IPV has become a public health issue of widespread concern. It is a challenge to obtain systematic and detailed data using questionnaires and interviews in traditional Chinese culture, because of face-saving and the victim’s shame factors. However, online comments about specific IPV events on social media provide rich data in understanding the public’s attitudes and emotions towards IPV. By applying text mining and sentiment analysis to the field of IPV, this study involved construction of a Chinese IPV sentiment dictionary and a complete research framework. We analyzed the trends of the Chinese public’s emotional evolution concerning IPV events from the perspectives of a time series as well as geographic space and social media. The results show that the anonymity of social networks and the guiding role of opinion leaders result in traditional cultural factors such as face-saving and family shame for IPV events being no longer applicable, leading to the spiral of an anti-silence effect. Meanwhile, in the process of public emotional communication, anger often overwhelms reason, and the spiral of silence remains in effect in social media. In addition, there are offensive words used in the IPV event texts that indicate misogyny in emotional, sexual, economic and psychological abuse. Fortunately, mainstream media, as crucial opinion leaders in the social network, can have a positive role in guiding public opinion, improving people’s ability to judge the validity of network information, and formulating people’s rational behaviour.

Highlights

  • Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most common type of domestic violence and a major public health problem [1]

  • Studies examining the impact of intimate partner violence (IPV) on negative outcomes and revictimization over time may guide our understanding of the immediate and delayed consequences of IPV for LGBT young people

  • This study quantified the experience of IPV among MSM in China and explored some factors associated with IPV experiences such as self-esteem and the age of first homosexual intercourse

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most common type of domestic violence and a major public health problem [1]. China Central Television (CCTV) reported that about 20% of households experience domestic violence in China. Since the COVID-19 outbreak, intimate partner violence (IPV) reports have increased globally. Mainland China’s first law to prevent domestic violence, the “Antidomestic Violence Law of the People’s Republic of China”, was formally implemented on 1 March 2016. The law clearly defines domestic violence as “the use of beatings, restrictions, and intentional disability, restrictions on personal freedom and frequent verbal abuse or intimidation characterized by physical, psychological or any other illegal acts among family members” [3]. With antidomestic violence legislation and implementation, domestic violence issues have gradually entered the public eye and aroused widespread public concern

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call