PTSD and anger: Evaluation of an indirect effect model in a civilian trauma sample

Abstract

Background and objectivesTheoretical models propose that PTSD symptoms and subjective anger are indirectly associated through hostile attribution bias, physiological reactivity, and aggressive psycho-motor scripts (Chemtob, Novaco, Hamada, Gross, & Smith, 1997). Originally developed to account for symptoms observed in military personnel, proposed anger mechanisms have received limited attention in civilian populations. The current study looked to evaluate the generalizability of Chemtob et al.‘s model in trauma-exposed university students (N = 152). MethodsTrauma exposure and corresponding symptoms were assessed during an initial screening procedure. Hostile attributions and aggressive scripts were examined prior to a laboratory-based anger induction procedure. Physiological reactivity was monitored throughout the provocation task. Ratings of subjective anger and anger recovery were completed following the induction period. Relations of post-trauma symptoms with subjective anger through hypothesized anger processes were examined using bootstrapped estimates of indirect effects. ResultsA significant indirect effect of PTSD severity on state-level anger was noted for hostile attribution bias (ab = 0.020, 95% CI [0.002, 0.041]) and a marginal effect through aggressive inclinations (ab = 0.015, 95% CI [-0.001, 0.039]). Data failed to provide evidence for physiological reactivity as an intervening variable. Trauma symptoms did not moderate anger recovery following the provocation task. LimitationsInduction of anger in a sub-clinical sample may limit tests of hypothesized effects and the generalizability of the present findings. ConclusionsResults indicate the proposed model may be applicable beyond combat trauma samples and suggest potential anger-related targets for PTSD treatment.