PTLD: Survival and analysis of prognostic factors in a cohort of 138 patients from a single institution.

Abstract

e19048 Background: The outcome and prognostic factors of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) varies in currently reported literature. We present one of the largest single institution retrospective analysis from University of Florida. Methods: Patient population was identified from EMR and charts were reviewed to collect data. Primary outcome was Overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was identification of prognostic factors. Results: We identified 138 patients with PTLD from Sept 1994 to Feb 2016 (liver 34%, Kidney 23%, heart 21%, lungs 12%, kidney-pancreas 2% and BMT 6%). After survival analysis, 131 patients were further followed for secondary outcomes. 36% (n = 47) were less than 18 years of age, 60% (n = 83) were males. The median age of PTLD diagnosis was 44 years and the median duration from transplant to PTLD was 4.4 years. Pathology was early lesion 6% (n = 8), polymorphic 17% (n = 23), Monomorphic 71% (n = 93), Hodgkin/like 4.5% (n = 6). Extra-nodal site involvement was 61% (n = 80), most common being GI tract. Ann-Arbor stage distribution was stage I/II 50% (n = 65), stage III/IV 46% (n = 60). Initial treatment was immunosuppression (IS) reduction alone in 24% (n = 31), Rituximab (R) 24% (n = 31), chemotherapy (+/- R) 46% (n = 60). Most common chemo regimen was CHOP (+/-R) 27% (N = 36). After first line, 48% patients had complete remission (CR), 18% partial remission (PR) and 15% progressive disease (PD). Second line treatment was required in 33% (n = 44) and 10% (n = 13) patients required 3rdline treatment. Final analysis showed 61% (n = 80) achieved CR, 17% (n = 22) had PD, 56% (n = 74) patients were alive and 49% (n = 64) are alive without PTLD. Median OS was 14.99 years. Multivariate analysis identified transplant age, organ transplant recipients, PTLD diagnosis age, performance status, IPI score, graft rejection, history of malignancy and recipient EBV status as prognostic factors (p < .05). Conclusions: This study from a leading regional transplant center shows notable OS which is likely from improved immunosuppressive regimens, treatment modalities and large pediatric population. We identified various prognostic factors affecting survival and propose validation to generate prognostic score.