Abstract

Abstract Introduction Considering the benefits of smoking cessation, and evolving new tobacco-product consumption, such as e-cigarettes (e-cig), contemporary behavioral and psychosocial factors (PSF) associated with smoking after acute stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) remain to be investigated. Methods From INEV@L, a prospective pilot study in 128 workers hospitalized for MI or stroke (MI/stroke: 199/57) <65 y, between 2016 and 2017 in CHU Dijon. Among them, 67 (52%) current smokers were analyzed. PSF (education level (EL), socioeconomic status (SES), perceived disease severity (PDS), anxiety/depression), and health behavior (adhesion to Mediterranean diet (AMD), BMI, physical activity (PA), smoking) were collected at the acute phase and at 6 Months Follow-Up. Patients who quit smoking were compared with non-quitting patients. Results Still smokers at 6-M FU were frequent (30 (45%)) and had similar risk factors including age (51±7 y) than quitters. Rate of overweight/obese patients and AMD were similar (52 vs 65%, p=0.281 and 29±6 vs 26±7, p=0.207). SES and EL were slightly higher in still smokers group. The level of anxiety or depression was as high in the 2 groups (63 vs 68%, and 19 vs 20%, p=0.717 and 0.911). Although similar at the acute phase (p=0.867), PDS at 6-M FU, trended to be lower in non-quitters (57 vs 78%, p=0.057). At FU, only few returned to work (57% for both groups). Overweight/obese who reduced their weight were more common in non-quitters (60 vs 38%, p=0.170). Patients who improved AMD or PA level were similar (62 vs 78%, p=0.166, and 67 vs 92%, p=0.317). The vast majority of non-quitters introduced the use of e-cig (80% vs 0%, p<0.001). Conclusion Our pilot study in young workers highlights the low rate of smoking cessation, and generalized dual use of electronic+conventional cigarette at mid-term after acute MI or stroke. Our findings further suggest specific PSF pattern of non-quitters, associated with loss of perceived disease severity. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Conseil Régional de Bourgogne Franche Comté et CHU Dijon Bourgogne

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.