Abstract

The currently available psychoprophylactic programs for the rehabilitation and resocialization of drug addicts are largely based on pedagogical measures of persuasion or coercion. However, the individual psychological determinants of addiction, which should be taken into account when organizing psychotherapeutic corrective measures, are often ignored. The aim of the study is to analyze the psychological factors that determine the propensity of individuals to addictive behavior against the background of social and psychological maladaptation. The empirical basis of the study consisted of 144 people between the ages of 20 and 40, anamnesis of who included drug dependence and social maladaptation. The experimental study included the results of interviews, observations, and the collection of formalized data using four multifactorial psychodiagnostic methods. The empirical study proved that the psychoprophylactic program of the correction of addictive behavior should include specific influences aimed at the development of neuro-psychic stability (the reduction of tension, emotional instability, uncontrolled behavioral emotional reactions); at the harmonization of the system of attitudes towards oneself (the reduction of the tendency to unproductive self-blame, intrapersonal conflict, and escapism); at the formation of productive strategies for social interaction (the reduction of rigidity and prevention of delinquent behavior). The psychoprophylactic program should direct the purposeful influence of exercises and training sessions to the reduction of the basic characteristics of the individual-psychological qualities defined in the study. Under these circumstances, the targeted impact will reduce the negative attitudes of addictive and socially maladaptive behavior.

Highlights

  • The main task of psychoprophylactic work aimed at the treatment of drug addiction is to neutralize physiological dependence and to eliminate psychological dependence

  • This can be explained by the fact that the increase in the indicator of addiction is determined by the increase in the point’s value of the corresponding scale of the PDB method, and the indicator of social and psychological maladaptation is determined by the decrease of the point’s value of the scale 1 by the SPA method

  • The step in the study is to analyze the correlation between an increase in the propensity for addictive behavior and other individual psychological factors presented by the selected methods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main task of psychoprophylactic work aimed at the treatment of drug addiction is to neutralize physiological dependence and to eliminate psychological dependence. This is due to the fact that the psychological attitudes developed under the influence of narcotism have a more profound destructive effect on drug addicts' behavior patterns that increases the risk of relapse. The deformation of psychic constructs under the influence of drug addiction causes social and psychological maladaptation of an addict Such violations of sociopsychological adaptation make it difficult to restore the normal social functioning of an addict in society. They give rise to negative experiences that encourage returning to drug use. This creates a vicious circle when the disruption of social adaptation forms the preconditions for drug addiction, which results in an even greater increase in the social maladaptation of an addict

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.