Abstract

Of 253 patients who had suffered acute myocardial infarction ( MI), 88 percent received daytime sedation while hospitalized. Sixty percent of all prescriptions were for phenobarbital, 30 percent for chlordiazepoxide, and 6 percent for meprobamate. In addition, 79 percent of patients received night time hypnotic medication. Sixty-six percent of such prescriptions were for short-acting barbiturates, 21 percent for chloral hydrate, and 7 percent for diphenhydramine. Multiple drug use was common. The barbiturates, while inexpensive sedative agents, are of questionable efficacy in reducing anxiety and probably produce only general CNS depression. A narrow margin of safety, liability to produce habituation, and antagonism of warfarin-type anticoagulants are other disadvantages. The benzodiazepine tranquilizers, whose antianxiety efficacy is more clearly established, do not produce general CNS depression, have a wide margin of safety, and do not interact with oral anticoagulants. Antidepressant agents, phenothiazine tranquilizers, and propranolol were used infrequently or not at all. The risks associated with the use of these agents in patients with acute myocardial infarction are considerable and should be weighed carefully before they are administered.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.