Abstract
Background The aims of this study were to test the validity, test–retest reliability, and internal consistency of Turkish version of FIS; the variables affecting FIS score. Materials and methods 71 MS patients and 68 healthy subjects were included to the study. Results Total FIS score and subscale scores were different statistically between MS patients and healthy volunteers in both first and second FIS applications ( p < 0.001). These results showed that FIS is validated in divergent direction. BDI score was higher in MS patients than healthy volunteers ( p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between two study groups for cognitive subscale scores, after the effect of depression was eliminated ( p > 0.05). To assess the test–retest reliability, the scores of two FIS applications did not differ statistically (cognitive t = 1.948 p > 0.05, physical t = 1.420 p = 0.160, social t = 1.470 p = 0.146, total t = 1.990 p = 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.89 (99% confidence interval: 0.79–0.94) for cognitive, 0.95 (0.91–0.97) for physical, 0.91 (0.83–0.95) for social, and 0.93 (0.86–0.96) for total FIS scores ( p < 0.001). EDSS correlated with physical subscores in both applications of FIS. Conclusion Turkish version of FIS, which is valid and reliable, seems an appropriate tool for the assessment of the effects of fatigue in Turkish MS population.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
