Abstract
This research presented the results of the process of creation and arrangement of the psychometric characteristics of the Questionnaire for the Evaluation of Digital Learning in Higher Education (QEDLHE). With a quantitative, predominantly instrumental approach, 379 students from different universities in Peru were considered for the validity and reliability stage. The reliability of instruments was assessed using the method of split halves with Pearson and Cronbach's Alpha ratified by the Guttman coefficient; in the exploratory factor analysis, the KMO (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin) contrast and Bartlett's test were used, the rotation method for convergence with Varimax with Kaiser normalization; in the confirmatory factor analysis, the AMOS23 tool was used. Two models were used to compare the best fit indicators as a result. The conclusions show that the instrument has been operationalized theoretically by five dimensions composed of twenty-four items.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
